As bad as the year was for equities, investors saw solid, positive returns delivered by large and small-cap stocks in the fourth quarter, providing them with much needed relief and the hope that the worst was behind them and 2023 could bring more positive headlines for financial markets.

Market Review

Investors could not turn the page fast enough on what was a truly painful year for major markets worldwide. 2022, due to a potent cocktail of very rare, disheartening macro and geopolitical events, was one of the worst years ever recorded, conspiring to push equities, bonds and many other asset classes toward new lows.

Unprecedented interest rate cycle
After a strong finish last year for most economies and financial markets, 2022 started on a positive note. However, the party that investors had enjoyed during the previous three years came to a rather abrupt halt early in the year, as market participants faced a barrage of steep market headwinds that broke their long, positive streak.  Most notable on the list of the ugliest headlines and highlights for 2022: the stubborn COVID-19 pandemic, the war in Ukraine, multi-decade high levels of inflation, one of the steepest interest rate hike cycles on record and weakening economies in the U.S., Europe and elsewhere, leading to a few rounds of downward revisions to U.S., Canadian and international corporate earnings for 2022 and 2023. Most likely, the most significant event of 2022 for financial markets worldwide was the streak of several consecutive interest rate hikes from the U.S. Federal Reserve, Bank of Canada and other major central banks.

A truly mediocre year for most risk assets
With very little positive new developments to build on and an incessant flow of negative headlines all year, the result of this macro storm was a truly mediocre year for most risk assets:

  • U.S. equities were down about 20% across market capitalizations, delivering their worst year since the major financial crisis of 2008.
  • The Russell 2500 Index saw an overall decline of 19%.
  • U.S. Treasury bonds dropped nearly 13%, registering their worst year on record.
  • U.S. corporate bonds saw record drops–high grade (-15%) and high yield (-11%).
  • Cryptocurrencies collapsed by 70%.
  • Large-cap Canadian equities were down 5.8% and Canadian small caps down 9.3%.
  • Global equities declined nearly 20% (according to the MSCI ACWI Index).
  • Global bonds saw a double-digit drop.
  • The FTSE G7 and EMU Government Bond Index fell 18.8%.
  • MSCI China saw a 20% drop in 2022, on top of a 21% correction in 2021.

Energy was the best-performing sector
Only a few asset classes managed to buck the trend in this broad bloodbath, such as cash, the U.S. dollar, oil and natural gas. Within the Canadian and U.S. equity markets, the energy sector was, by far, the best-performing sector in 2022—up 50%+ for both small and large caps. For most of the year, however, it was a bloodbath across most sectors and all market capitalizations. Most notably, the stocks of the large technology bellwethers and most growth stocks had an excruciating performance, experiencing a dramatic contraction in their (lofty) valuation multiples. More broadly, in the small-cap market, the Communication Services, Consumer Discretionary, Technology, Healthcare and Real Estate sectors had a particularly difficult year, with negative returns close to or below -30%. Interestingly, the gap between the best-performing sector (Energy) and the worst-performing sector (Communication Services) was the widest since 2000 (during the technology bubble meltdown).  In the end, calendar 2022 will go down as the 7th worst year ever for U.S. large-cap stocks.

Small caps are trading at a meaningful discount
U.S., Canadian and international small-cap stocks, despite a strong finish to the year in the fourth quarter, still underperformed large caps in the last three months of the year, capping off another year of disappointing returns relative to large-company stocks. In fact, 2022 prolonged a very long unfavorable cycle for the U.S small-cap category, becoming the sixth consecutive year of underperformance for small caps relative to large-cap stocks. In the end, this was the worst year for U.S. small caps in terms of absolute returns since 2008 and their 10th worst calendar year on record since 1926. As we start this new year, it is worth noting that small caps are trading at a meaningful discount to large caps, with the potential to grow earnings faster in 2023 and beyond. As bad as the year was for equities, investors saw solid, positive returns delivered by large and small-cap stocks in the fourth quarter, providing them with much needed relief and the hope that the worst was behind them and 2023 could bring more positive headlines for financial markets.

Quarterly results by strategy

Canadian Small Cap Equity Strategy

Investment Performance

The following table shows the investment performance of the VB Canadian Pension Fund Composite, compared to the S&P/TSX Canadian Small Cap Index and the S&P/TSX Composite Index (as of December 31, 2022).

3 Mos. %1 Yr. % 4 Yrs. %5 Yrs. %10 Yrs. %20 Yrs. %25 Yrs. %Since Inception**
VB Cdn. Composite8.79-15.897.121.728.9610.279.0111.86
S&P/TSX Canadian Small Cap Index*8.37-9.299.293.144.234.964.226.15
S&P/TSX Composite Blended Index5.96-5.8411.196.857.748.477.008.54
Value Added (VB minus S&P/TSX Small Cap Index*)0.42-6.60-2.17-1.424.735.314.795.71

Portfolio performance returns are presented gross of fees

*Note: Results are the BMO Small Cap Blended Weighted Index from June 30, 1992 to December 31, 1999 and thereafter the S&P/TSX Canadian Small Cap Index.

** Note : June 30, 1992

 

Portfolio Positioning

In Q4, we outperformed the benchmark for the third quarter in a row, despite significant market volatility, allowing us to continue clawing back our relative year-to-date shortfall from earlier in 2022—when the Energy and Commodity Sectors moved up significantly following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

In the fourth quarter, our careful stock selection generated significant value-add and excess returns, proving that our positioning into high-conviction, high-quality small-cap stocks with vastly superior fundamentals is a winning recipe. Security selection generated alpha in virtually every sector of the market. Our portfolio companies continued to see solid financial results in this increasingly challenging macro environment, with most of our holdings delivering numbers in line with or better than our expectations, despite growing pressure points on the economy. Overall, most of our portfolio companies coped quite well with the growing inflationary pressures so prevalent in most end markets, exhibiting both strong pricing power and solid cost efficiencies. Against a backdrop of soaring interest rates, our portfolio remains very well positioned with low levels of leverage and no portfolio names negatively exposed to higher rates.

Despite a reversal in performance late in the year, the Energy sector still managed to significantly outperform the broader Canadian small-cap market in 2022. As a result, our continued lack of exposure to energy was a significant headwind to our relative performance for the year. Although we continued to close the relative shortfall versus the index as the year progressed, we were unable to fully overcome the energy sector headwind by year-end, like we had in 2021. More specifically, our relative underperformance in 2022 was entirely attributed to these headwinds.

With 40-year high inflation levels and high (and rapidly rising) interest rates, company-specific fundamentals and valuations typically matter a lot more to investors, leading to a much wider dispersion between small-cap stocks. In this environment, only the stocks of high-quality companies have demonstrated a unique ability to deliver consistent results and outperform their peers. This year was no different. Our high-quality names held up very well in 2022, outperforming other, less-stellar stocks, which fell to new lows.

Significant contributors to performance include:

– IBI Group Inc. (+43.9% in 2022)
– Element Fleet Management Corp. (+13.8% in Q4 and +46.5% YTD)
– Trisura Group Ltd. (+35.6% in Q4 and -5.0% YTD)
– Stella-Jones Inc. (+25.6% in Q4 and +23.7% in 2022)
– Uni-Select Inc. (+17.4% in Q4 and +66.4% in 2022)
– 5N Plus Inc. (74.3% in Q4 and 22.3% in 2022)
– Altus Group Ltd. (21.0% in Q4 and -22.9% in 2022)
– Enghouse Systems (24.8% in Q4 and -24.1% in 2022)

Stocks that detracted from our portfolio’s performance include:

– AirBoss of America Corp. (-9.8% in Q4 and -83.4% YTD)
– Tucows Inc. (-12.7% in Q4 and -56.7% in 2022)
– Topicus.com (+7.0% in Q4 and -38.8% in 2022)
– Colliers International Group (-1.6% in Q4 and -33.8% YTD)
– Sleep Country Canada Holdings Inc. (-5.1% in Q4 and -36.8% in 2022)
– Spin Master Corp (-19.7% in Q4 and -30.2% in 2022)
– MDA Ltd. (-11.7% in Q4 and -32.6% in 2022)

Portfolio Changes

We continued to further enhance the quality and long-term positioning of our portfolio through the addition of very promising, high-quality names and our targeted portfolio activity. Against a backdrop of significant individual stock price movements in our small-cap market, our portfolio changes were focused on adding long-term alpha to your portfolio:

  • We further increased our positions in some of our high-conviction holdings (Tucows and Colliers International Group), where current valuations no longer fairly reflect the long-term organic and acquisition growth potential for these companies.
  • We trimmed our positions in some of our long-term winners, such as Trisura Group, Boyd Group Services and Stella Jones, due to valuation and weight management factors.
  • We initiated two new positions, namely Computer Modelling Group (a leading global supplier of advanced process reservoir modelling software) and Tecsys (a provider of enterprise distribution management software).
  • We sold off two positions—Exco Technologies (a manufacturer of precision-engineered tooling for automotive and industrial markets) and FirstService Corporation (a leading provider of branded essential property services)—to recycle the proceeds in other smaller-cap names with a more attractive risk-reward profile.
  • Since we strongly believe in a focused, high-conviction, well-researched portfolio, our most significant purchases include Computer Modelling Group, Tecsys, Tucows, Colliers International Group and Spin Master Corp.

Outlook

Most of the headwinds and pressure points that strangled financial markets and decimated investor sentiment in 2022 did not magically disappear on the last day of the year. In fact, inflation remains at stubbornly high levels, with little sign of cooling, and interest rates are bound to move up before the mighty hike cycle is over. This terrible combination is likely to cause what many investors dread in the early part of 2023: a significant economic slowdown and, most likely, a recession worldwide. With this particularly difficult macro outlook, corporate earnings are bound to face stiff pressure and growth is likely to decelerate and turn negative, at least for some sectors. Therefore, there is the potential for additional downward pressure on earnings estimates, despite the significant downward revisions well underway last year.

As long-term, bottom-up investors, however, we are quite optimistic about our small-cap category’s risk/reward profile for long-term investors. With such a dramatic decline in our small-cap market, we believe that most small-cap stocks, especially high-quality companies trading at very reasonable valuations, are already largely discounting the near-term prospects of a recession, limiting material additional downside risk, should a recession officially materialize.

In addition, small-cap stocks have almost always led the way out of bear markets, outperforming large-cap stocks and other asset classes early in the cycle. In fact, historically, bear markets, like the one that we suffered in 2022, tend to act as a key catalyst for the next small cap outperformance cycle, plus most of the excess returns delivered by small-cap stocks versus large caps and other asset categories usually occur early in the cycle. Historical data shows that when inflation is high but lower than the previous year, small-cap stocks tend to perform quite well, both in absolute terms and relative to large caps.

After many years of underperformance, Canadian small-cap stocks are currently trading at the most substantial discount in 22 years. For investors with long-term investment horizons, we believe that this point in the cycle should prove to be an excellent entry point, with very attractive long-term return prospects from the current depressed valuations. We are even more bullish about our portfolio’s long-term return prospects. With high inflation, high interest rates, a more challenging operating environment, a weaker economy and pressure on earnings, we strongly believe that only the stocks of high-quality, well-managed, attractively valued companies with superior business models, sustainable competitive advantages and stronger growth will outperform.

As we start 2023, our portfolio is still trading at a sizeable 10% discount to its intrinsic value, exhibiting considerable upside potential. We remain quite enthusiastic about the long-term return prospects of our small-cap strategy and our continued ability to generate consistent excess returns through any cycle and virtually any market environment.

 

  • We trimmed our positions in some of our long-term winners, such as Trisura Group, Boyd Group Services and Stella Jones, due to valuation and weight management factors.
  • We initiated two new positions, namely Computer Modelling Group (a leading global supplier of advanced process reservoir modelling software) and Tecsys (a provider of enterprise distribution management software).
  • We sold off two positions—Exco Technologies (a manufacturer of precision-engineered tooling for automotive and industrial markets) and FirstService Corporation (a leading provider of branded essential property services)—to recycle the proceeds in other smaller-cap names with a more attractive risk-reward profile.
  • Since we strongly believe in a focused, high-conviction, well-researched portfolio, our most significant purchases include Computer Modelling Group, Tecsys, Tucows, Colliers International Group and Spin Master Corp.

Outlook

Most of the headwinds and pressure points that strangled financial markets and decimated investor sentiment in 2022 did not magically disappear on the last day of the year. In fact, inflation remains at stubbornly high levels, with little sign of cooling, and interest rates are bound to move up before the mighty hike cycle is over. This terrible combination is likely to cause what many investors dread in the early part of 2023: a significant economic slowdown and, most likely, a recession worldwide. With this particularly difficult macro outlook, corporate earnings are bound to face stiff pressure and growth is likely to decelerate and turn negative, at least for some sectors. Therefore, there is the potential for additional downward pressure on earnings estimates, despite the significant downward revisions well underway last year.

As long-term, bottom-up investors, however, we are quite optimistic about our small-cap category’s risk/reward profile for long-term investors. With such a dramatic decline in our small-cap market, we believe that most small-cap stocks, especially high-quality companies trading at very reasonable valuations, are already largely discounting the near-term prospects of a recession, limiting material additional downside risk, should a recession officially materialize.

In addition, small-cap stocks have almost always led the way out of bear markets, outperforming large-cap stocks and other asset classes early in the cycle. In fact, historically, bear markets, like the one that we suffered in 2022, tend to act as a key catalyst for the next small cap outperformance cycle, plus most of the excess returns delivered by small-cap stocks versus large caps and other asset categories usually occur early in the cycle. Historical data shows that when inflation is high but lower than the previous year, small-cap stocks tend to perform quite well, both in absolute terms and relative to large caps.

After many years of underperformance, Canadian small-cap stocks are currently trading at the most substantial discount in 22 years. For investors with long-term investment horizons, we believe that this point in the cycle should prove to be an excellent entry point, with very attractive long-term return prospects from the current depressed valuations. We are even more bullish about our portfolio’s long-term return prospects. With high inflation, high interest rates, a more challenging operating environment, a weaker economy and pressure on earnings, we strongly believe that only the stocks of high-quality, well-managed, attractively valued companies with superior business models, sustainable competitive advantages and stronger growth will outperform.

As we start 2023, our portfolio is still trading at a sizeable 10% discount to its intrinsic value, exhibiting considerable upside potential. We remain quite enthusiastic about the long-term return prospects of our small-cap strategy and our continued ability to generate consistent excess returns through any cycle and virtually any market environment.

 

U.S. Small Cap Equity Strategy

Investment Performance

The following table shows the investment performance of the VB U.S. Pension Fund Composite (in U.S. dollars), compared to the Russell 2000 Small Cap Index and the S&P 500 Index (as of December 31, 2022).

3 Mos. %1 Yr. %4 Yrs. %5 Yrs. %7 Yrs. %10 Yrs. %15 Yrs. %20 Yrs. %Since Inception* %
Portfolio13.76-11.7711.068.1811.7412.7610.7912.0011.94
Russell 2000 Index6.23-20.448.304.137.909.017.169.367.01
S&P 600 Index9.19-16.109.815.889.6610.828.8910.649.16
S&P 500 Index7.56-18.1113.189.4211.4812.568.819.806.43
Value Added (Portfolio minus Russell 2000 Index)1.968.672.764.053.843.753.632.644.93

Portfolio performance returns are presented gross of fees

* Note : June 30, 2000

 

Portfolio Positioning

Our portfolio companies maintained strong fundamentals and delivered consistent financial performance at or above our expectations, and while it took quite a bit of time this year for these superior attributes to pay off in terms of relative returns, our high-quality positioning finally led to steep outperformance later in the year.

Given inflation levels at 40-year highs and dramatic interest rate hikes, the days where virtually all the stocks in our small-cap category performed quite well, regardless of their company-specific fundamentals or valuations, as was the case for most of 2020 and 2021, can be deemed officially over, as evidenced by the factors driving outperformance in our market in 2022. Increasingly, we have seen a much wider dispersion and a lower correlation between stocks in our small-cap universe and much more discrimination in individual stock price performances. Within this environment, primarily high-quality companies have demonstrated the unique capacity to produce consistent returns and outperform their peers in 2022, while lower-quality stocks fell to new lows in this cycle.

We have now outperformed our small-cap benchmark in seven of the last eight calendar years and 10 of the last 12 calendar years, demonstrating the consistency of our small-cap strategy, despite dramatic market swings and very different economic environments over this time period. With our significant outperformance once again in 2022, our small-cap strategy has meaningfully outperformed its small-cap benchmark in all the calendar years when our category posted negative returns since its inception. In addition, our small-cap strategy has also outperformed its benchmark in most strong market environments, generating alpha most calendar years, even when our small-cap category was up in the double digits.

Our ability to add value and generate consistent alpha in almost any market environment reflects our significant efforts to maintain a balance in our model portfolio between core defensive holdings with limited sensitivity to the economic cycle, consistent growth and strong returns on equity, and our investments in attractively valued, growth cyclical companies more exposed to the economic cycle that generate strong returns coming out of recessions and bear markets.

Significant contributors to performance in Q4 2022 include :
– Universal Health Services (60.02)
– YETI (44.9%)
– Envestnet (40.4%)
– Grand Canyon Education (31.7%)
– Tempur Sealy International (42.9%)
– RLI Corp. (38.1%)
– Federal Signal (26.0%)
– Blucora (32.5%)
– Maximus (27.2%)
– Blackbaud (33.6%)
– Euronet Worldwide (24.2%)
– Primoris Services (35.4%)
– Ensign Group (19.1%)
– Globus Medical (24.8%)
– Iridium Communications (16.6%)
– Gentherm (31.3%)
– Thermon Group (37.4%)

Stocks that detracted from our portfolio’s performance in Q4 2022 include:
– DigitalOcean (-27.8%)
– Qualys (-18.9%)
– DoubleVerify (-18.6%)
– Armstrong World Industries (-13.1%)
– HealthEquity (-7.5%)
– Shake Shack (-7.7%)

Portfolio Changes

While we did not add any new investments to our small-cap strategy in the fourth quarter, we remained quite proactive and disciplined when it came to our existing portfolio stocks, maintaining the best possible model portfolio for our investors in any market environment:

  • We continued to build our positions in Armstrong World Industries, Cerence and DigitalOcean, since the stocks of these high-quality companies underperformed significantly in the recent months, despite no real changes to their long-term fundamentals, opening up nice investment opportunities at incredibly attractive valuations.
  • We added to our positions in Euronet Worldwide, Silicon Laboratories, Envestnet, HealthEquity and Hamilton Lane, to name a few, outstanding companies with solid fundamentals that, nevertheless, suffered from a meaningful contraction in their valuation multiples, further improving their attractive risk/reward profile.

To fund our fourth quarter buying activity, we decreased certain positions:

  • We reduced our position in Thermon Group, which had started to better reflect the company’s much improved fundamentals.
  • We reduced our positions in Grand Canyon Education, RLI Corp. and Iridium Communications, three outstanding core holdings that had outperformed significantly and, as a result, had become much larger positions at slightly less attractive valuations.
  • We trimmed our weight in NMI Holdings, as the stock had held up quite well despite a rapidly deteriorating housing market and a cloudy outlook for the mortgage industry that could negatively impact the company’s financial performance.

Outlook

To be sure, most of the macro challenges and pressure points that annihilated major financial markets and eroded investor sentiment did not suddenly magically vanish at the stroke of midnight on December 31. In fact, inflation levels are still alarmingly high and showing little sign of dwindling and, before 2022’s relentless cycle of interest rate hikes is complete, more are inevitable. In the first quarter of 2023, this perfect storm of negative macro conditions may lead to the major economic downturn and, most likely, the global recession that many investors fear. Corporate earnings will undoubtedly be under significant pressure due to this exceptionally challenging macroeconomic outlook, and growth, at least for some industries, is expected to slow and even be negative. As a result, despite the substantial downward revisions that already had started last year, we may very well see further downward pressure on earnings projections.

Nevertheless, as bottom-up, long-term investors, we are fairly positive about the risk/reward profile of our small-cap category for investors with long-term investment horizons. We believe that almost all small-cap stocks, particularly high-quality names trading at very reasonable valuations, are already heavily discounting the near-term possibility of a recession, minimizing any additional significant downside risk, should a recession officially occur.

Moreover, historically, small-cap stocks have generally outperformed large caps and other asset classes coming out of bear markets similar to the one that we experienced in 2022. Most of the excess returns that small-cap stocks deliver (relative to large caps and other asset categories) tend to be early in the cycle. Historical data indicates that small caps perform quite well, both in absolute terms and relative to large caps, when inflation levels are high but lower than the previous year.

Also, relative to large caps, after a record six consecutive years of lower relative returns versus the average under-performance cycle of just over four years, small-cap stocks currently trade at a substantial discount to their historical averages and are in bullish territory at these levels.

Given high interest rates, high inflation levels, anemic economic growth and pressure on earnings, we also believe that only high-quality, well-managed, attractively priced names with outstanding business models, sustainable competitive advantages and robust growth will be the top performers.

If fundamentals rule the day in 2023—as we expect—our portfolio will be well positioned to shine with its best-in-class financial metrics. In addition, our small-cap portfolio is still trading at a meaningful 17% discount to its intrinsic value, a very reasonable valuation despite the rally in our market and the strong portfolio returns we delivered in Q4.

  • We continued to build our positions in Armstrong World Industries, Cerence and DigitalOcean, since the stocks of these high-quality companies underperformed significantly in the recent months, despite no real changes to their long-term fundamentals, opening up nice investment opportunities at incredibly attractive valuations.
  • We added to our positions in Euronet Worldwide, Silicon Laboratories, Envestnet, HealthEquity and Hamilton Lane, to name a few, outstanding companies with solid fundamentals that, nevertheless, suffered from a meaningful contraction in their valuation multiples, further improving their attractive risk/reward profile.

To fund our fourth quarter buying activity, we decreased certain positions:

  • We reduced our position in Thermon Group, which had started to better reflect the company’s much improved fundamentals.
  • We reduced our positions in Grand Canyon Education, RLI Corp. and Iridium Communications, three outstanding core holdings that had outperformed significantly and, as a result, had become much larger positions at slightly less attractive valuations.
  • We trimmed our weight in NMI Holdings, as the stock had held up quite well despite a rapidly deteriorating housing market and a cloudy outlook for the mortgage industry that could negatively impact the company’s financial performance.

Outlook

To be sure, most of the macro challenges and pressure points that annihilated major financial markets and eroded investor sentiment did not suddenly magically vanish at the stroke of midnight on December 31. In fact, inflation levels are still alarmingly high and showing little sign of dwindling and, before 2022’s relentless cycle of interest rate hikes is complete, more are inevitable. In the first quarter of 2023, this perfect storm of negative macro conditions may lead to the major economic downturn and, most likely, the global recession that many investors fear. Corporate earnings will undoubtedly be under significant pressure due to this exceptionally challenging macroeconomic outlook, and growth, at least for some industries, is expected to slow and even be negative. As a result, despite the substantial downward revisions that already had started last year, we may very well see further downward pressure on earnings projections.

Nevertheless, as bottom-up, long-term investors, we are fairly positive about the risk/reward profile of our small-cap category for investors with long-term investment horizons. We believe that almost all small-cap stocks, particularly high-quality names trading at very reasonable valuations, are already heavily discounting the near-term possibility of a recession, minimizing any additional significant downside risk, should a recession officially occur.

Moreover, historically, small-cap stocks have generally outperformed large caps and other asset classes coming out of bear markets similar to the one that we experienced in 2022. Most of the excess returns that small-cap stocks deliver (relative to large caps and other asset categories) tend to be early in the cycle. Historical data indicates that small caps perform quite well, both in absolute terms and relative to large caps, when inflation levels are high but lower than the previous year.

Also, relative to large caps, after a record six consecutive years of lower relative returns versus the average under-performance cycle of just over four years, small-cap stocks currently trade at a substantial discount to their historical averages and are in bullish territory at these levels.

Given high interest rates, high inflation levels, anemic economic growth and pressure on earnings, we also believe that only high-quality, well-managed, attractively priced names with outstanding business models, sustainable competitive advantages and robust growth will be the top performers.

If fundamentals rule the day in 2023—as we expect—our portfolio will be well positioned to shine with its best-in-class financial metrics. In addition, our small-cap portfolio is still trading at a meaningful 17% discount to its intrinsic value, a very reasonable valuation despite the rally in our market and the strong portfolio returns we delivered in Q4.

Greater China Growth Strategy

Investment Performance

The following table shows the investment performance results of the VB Golden Dragon Pension Fund Composite (in U.S. dollars), compared to the MSCI China and the MSCI Golden Dragon Small Cap Index (as of December 31, 2022).

3 Mos. %1 Yr. %2 Yrs. %3 Yrs. %4 Yrs. %5 Yrs. %7 Yrs.(%10 Yrs. %Since Inception* %
Portfolio26.09-2.26-1.9110.6013.387.718.086.529.62
MSCI China Index13.52-21.80-21.72-7.38-0.44-4.403.192.624.33
MSCI Golden Dragon Small Cap Index13.49-22.52-3.905.358.312.555.464.866.43
Value Added (Portfolio minus MSCI China Index)12.5719.5419.8117.9813.8212.114.893.905.29

Portfolio performance returns are presented gross of fees

* Note : December 31, 2011

 

Portfolio Positioning

After buying high-quality stocks at once-in-a-lifetime valuations in the third quarter, we purchased even cheaper names in Q4. In one case, we have already seen 150% return already. This stock, even after a spectacular run, still trades at an undemanding 9x and is our top-weighted stock today.

Given decades of local market experience, we have the expertise to stick to a game plan of buying the stocks of high-quality, well-managed companies positioned to help reach China’s goals of becoming a moderately prosperous society, improving the nation’s quality of life and helping bridge its income inequality.

Our game plan also avoided sectors where the government will take a more active approach in determining how businesses are run, which tends to dampen ROE in both amplitude and duration. Nevertheless, the Chinese government also understands what made China the second largest economy in the world today. As a result, we were extremely active in the early part of the fourth quarter to take advantage of the correction and slow down towards year-end to ride the “melt-up.”

In Q4, our high-conviction stock picking proved to be a winning strategy. Eight out of our “Top 10” stocks delivered more than a 15% return, starting at a robust minimum 2.5% weight in the portfolio. More importantly, four out of these 10 stocks—CGS, Hua Hong, JD Health and BOC Aviation—were new names added during the year. This is an illustration of how we can capitalize on our nimbleness and proven research process to take advantage of market disparities, a definite requirement for delivering strong results in the fast-paced world of Asia.

Our five top performers contributed 9.9% to our portfolio in the fourth quarter:
– Weimob (+141%)
– Lotus (+56%)
– Country Garden Services (+69%)
– Vipshop (+62%)
– Trip.com  (+31%)

A special mention should go to Lotus, which delivered an incredible 140% return in 2022 and contributed significantly to our portfolio’s annual performance—as our top-weighted stock throughout the year.

Our bottom five stocks detracted -0.3% from the portfolio in Q4:

– New World Development (-15.7%)
– Merida Industry (–4.4%)
– Merry Electronics (-3.3%)
– COLI (1.3%)
– Samsonite (8.7%)

Portfolio Changes

After a very active October, our trading activities slowed down dramatically from mid-November onward:

  • We aggressively rotated our Taiwan and Singapore positions to Hong Kong, which allowed us to buy more cheap Chinese stocks, reducing our total weights in these regions by 5% of the portfolio.
  • Profits were taken in Formosa Hotel, Lotus, SGX and Straits Trading to fund the purchases.
  • We also trimmed our “travel” exposure to Samsonite, Yum China, Galaxy and Trip.com) as investors priced in China’s reopening.
  • Most of our Chinese purchases were deployed to Country Garden, Hua Hong, JD Health, Geely and Bank of China Aviation.
  • We fully exited from our small positions in Tong Yang, PCHome and New World to fund our higher-weighted stock purchases.

In the fourth quarter, opportunities continue to be abundant from a valuation standpoint, keeping our team extremely busy. One of the keys to our long-term investment success is ensuring that we pick the right companies in the right sectors—in other words, sectors aligned with the new China of sustainable, quality growth versus the past’s of “growth at all costs” mentality. As a result, we also made these portfolio changes:

  • We also added some US ADR exposure for the first time—namely, DADA (+47%) and VIPS (+62%)—with the expectation that the ADR delist risk will soon be off the table.
  • We trimmed our Consumer Sector weight from 39% to 35.8% as we took profits from our travel stocks, now that markets are pricing in the impact of China’s reopening.
  • We increased our technology exposure from 17% to 19.2% on improved performance, ADR delist risk dissipating and the run of anti-trust measures for the sector to tail off.

Outlook

In the fourth quarter, Asian investors were less concerned about China compared to their counterparts in Europe and North America. Despite a year-end rally, many investors are in denial and continue to remain underweight in China. The rapid reopening of China presents a strong case of for more consumption and pent-up demand.

From an economic perspective, the earlier timing of Chinese New Year holidays in 2023 will lessen manufacturing breakdowns since most of the country already shut down production lines. In theory, the “good news” is that the virus will likely run through China quicker than anybody ever imagined and get China back to its feet faster than expected.

Earnings growth expectations range from 10% to 20%, although most estimates see a minimum of 10% growth for 2023. Negative revisions have also been baked in due to China’s COVID-19 lockdowns. The nation’s monetary and fiscal policies also have room to support its economy. Although China today deserves some valuation discount due to its unpredictable anti-trust policy responses over the last two years, its efforts to expand the middle-income class should not be ignored. In the end, we certainly are not trying to predict what China will do in 2023 or whether there is more downside risk from here. However, for investors with a long-term horizon, we believe that this point in the cycle should prove to be an excellent entry point, with very attractive long-term prospects from the current depressed valuations.

We strongly believe that only the stocks of high-quality with superior management will continue to outperform— despite all the policy uncertainties in China. Last year, we actively purchased outstanding companies in the services-led and consumption space, paving the way for continued strong stock returns.

Going forward, our investors will continue to benefit from our institutional knowledge local perspective and time-tested approach to investing in high-quality, well-managed companies with solid business model. Our portfolio, which is currently trading at 15.7x forward earnings on a 20% long-term growth rate, should reward our investors well into the long term. Despite all the doom and gloom, Asian stocks are close to entering a bull market as China’s reopening and a weakening U.S. dollar lure investors back to the region with, as history has shown, trough-to-peak returns in excess of 70%—in no fewer than seven out of 10 times after a major emerging market trough.

In the fourth quarter, opportunities continue to be abundant from a valuation standpoint, keeping our team extremely busy. One of the keys to our long-term investment success is ensuring that we pick the right companies in the right sectors—in other words, sectors aligned with the new China of sustainable, quality growth versus the past’s of “growth at all costs” mentality. As a result, we also made these portfolio changes:

  • We also added some US ADR exposure for the first time—namely, DADA (+47%) and VIPS (+62%)—with the expectation that the ADR delist risk will soon be off the table.
  • We trimmed our Consumer Sector weight from 39% to 35.8% as we took profits from our travel stocks, now that markets are pricing in the impact of China’s reopening.
  • We increased our technology exposure from 17% to 19.2% on improved performance, ADR delist risk dissipating and the run of anti-trust measures for the sector to tail off.

Outlook

In the fourth quarter, Asian investors were less concerned about China compared to their counterparts in Europe and North America. Despite a year-end rally, many investors are in denial and continue to remain underweight in China. The rapid reopening of China presents a strong case of for more consumption and pent-up demand.

From an economic perspective, the earlier timing of Chinese New Year holidays in 2023 will lessen manufacturing breakdowns since most of the country already shut down production lines. In theory, the “good news” is that the virus will likely run through China quicker than anybody ever imagined and get China back to its feet faster than expected.

Earnings growth expectations range from 10% to 20%, although most estimates see a minimum of 10% growth for 2023. Negative revisions have also been baked in due to China’s COVID-19 lockdowns. The nation’s monetary and fiscal policies also have room to support its economy. Although China today deserves some valuation discount due to its unpredictable anti-trust policy responses over the last two years, its efforts to expand the middle-income class should not be ignored. In the end, we certainly are not trying to predict what China will do in 2023 or whether there is more downside risk from here. However, for investors with a long-term horizon, we believe that this point in the cycle should prove to be an excellent entry point, with very attractive long-term prospects from the current depressed valuations.

We strongly believe that only the stocks of high-quality with superior management will continue to outperform— despite all the policy uncertainties in China. Last year, we actively purchased outstanding companies in the services-led and consumption space, paving the way for continued strong stock returns.

Going forward, our investors will continue to benefit from our institutional knowledge local perspective and time-tested approach to investing in high-quality, well-managed companies with solid business model. Our portfolio, which is currently trading at 15.7x forward earnings on a 20% long-term growth rate, should reward our investors well into the long term. Despite all the doom and gloom, Asian stocks are close to entering a bull market as China’s reopening and a weakening U.S. dollar lure investors back to the region with, as history has shown, trough-to-peak returns in excess of 70%—in no fewer than seven out of 10 times after a major emerging market trough.

U.S. Small-Mid Cap Equity Strategy

Investment Performance

The following table shows the investment performance of the VB U.S. Small-Mid Cap Pension Fund Composite (in U.S. dollars), compared to the Russell 2500 Small Cap Index and the S&P 500 Index (as of December 31, 2022).

3 Mos. %1 Yr. %2 Yrs. %3 Yrs. % 4 Yrs. %5 Yrs. %Since Inception* %
Portfolio11.86-18.66-2.843.449.426.897.88
Russell 2500 Index7.43-18.37-1.785.0010.285.896.63
Value Added (Portfolio minus Russell 2500 Index)4.43-0.29-1.06-1.56-0.861.001.25

Portfolio performance returns are presented gross of fees.

* Note : September 30, 2017

 

Portfolio Positioning

Although it was a tough year for our small and mid cap equity strategy, we strongly outperformed our benchmark in the fourth quarter, allowing us to claw back almost all our 2022 underperformance to end the year within 30 basis points of the R2500 for the year.

Most of our outperformance in Q4 came from stock selection. On a sector basis, Materials and Energy, where we have no exposure, led the way in the fourth quarter with returns of 16% and 13.3% respectively. This, combined with an underweight in Industrials, produced an allocation drag. On the flipside, our large overweight in the Consumer Discretionary sector, which outperformed in the fourth quarter, produced a positive allocation benefit. Our weighting in other sectors were not significant from an allocation perspective in Q4.

We ended the fourth quarter with three sectors over 20%: Financials (+23.2%), Consumer Discretionary (+23.4%) and IT (+22%). These were the three largest portfolio sectors in the portfolio 12 months ago, but our weight in Consumer is down somewhat, as we sold out of Frontdoor, Purple and Acushnet, and added GoDaddy and DigitalOcean Holdings, both IT sector stocks, over the past year.

For the year, the big story for our portfolio was in sector allocation, which is not something that is material on a regular basis. Of course, we had some underperformers on a stock specific basis, but the 50% return in Energy, where historically we have had very limited investment, along with Materials, cost us 285 basis points in negative allocation. Only our overweight in Financials and lack of exposure to Real Estate produced positive allocation benefits. As we mentioned in other Quarterly Reviews, we never buy an Energy stock that does not meet our profit and quality criteria, so we sometimes must “take it on the chin” when lower-quality sectors like Energy have big rallies. However, we don’t see the ingredients for some kind of super cycle in Energy right now, so we think the allocation impact in 2023 will be muted.

From a stock perspective, our best performers were our longer-term holdings like StoneX (63.5%), which benefited from rising interest rates. Although we did not take any specific steps to tilt the portfolio more towards interest-sensitive names, arguably a mistake in hindsight, the good news is that this theme most likely had its strongest performance last year and we look forward to showing the through-the-cycle nature of many names in our portfolio.

From a stock selection standpoint, we had many positive contributors in the fourth quarter, with 13 stocks producing more than a 20% total return. Our biggest stock returns came from :
– YETI (+44.9%)
– Envestnet (+39.0%)
– RLI (+35.5%)
– Gentherm (+31.3%)

From a portfolio contribution perspective, RLI (+72bp), Grand Canyon Education (+59bp), ENV (+63bp) and Federal Signal (+50bp) were our largest contributors.

For the year, our underperforming names, to summarize, include:
– Cerence (-75%)
– Purple Innovation (-69%)
– Sotera Health (-64%)
– Pennant Group (-52%)
None of these names were in the “Top 20” of our portfolio, and only Purple resulted in the crystallisation of a loss, so we are hopeful that the other four names will be positive contributors to performance in 2023.

Portfolio Changes

Trading activity was limited in the fourth quarter with few valuation anomalies emerging:

  • In total, we sold out of six companies throughout 2022, including Frontdoor, Purple Innovation, CBOE, University Health Services, Acushnet Holdings and Primoris.
  • We added Armstrong World Industries, YETI, GoDaddy, DigitalOcean Holdings and Hamilton Lane to the portfolio.
  • Overall portfolio concentration has moved up slightly: our “Top 10” stocks now represent 31.3% of the overall portfolio and our “Top 20” stocks represent 57.1% of our total weight, versus 54.7% at the end of 2021.
  • Our higher-weighted stocks saw better performance overall than some of our lower-weight names, where performance was volatile.
  • We did not add any new names to the portfolio in the fourth quarter and made no outright sales.

Our biggest sale of a longer-tenured position was in Virtu Financial, where we believe that the regulatory environment is turning more negative, and the inability of the company to be rewarded for a more consistent delivery of earnings makes us believe that the public markets are not prepared to put a high multiple on the earnings.

Our pipeline of opportunities remains strong. We have approved a few new ideas in principle, but the key stumbling block with these names remains their valuation. With these candidates, we are currently waiting for the right entry point before we start building these positions. Given the volatility in today’s markets, we are confident that one or two of them will be actionable in the first quarter of 2023, but we are not prepared to sacrifice our goal of a 15% compound annual return in our investments, if it means we buy into the name at the wrong level. We still believe that our patience will be rewarded in the long run.

Outlook

In 2022, interest rate and macro themes resulted in a very sector-driven and thematic-oriented market, where we struggled due to our broadly interest rate neutral stance and our lack of exposure to commodities and energy. A market with high sector correlation and low dispersion tends to be a tough market for bottom-up investing. We think that the impact of these issues will be much lower as we get close to peak rates and energy stock prices continue their broad reversal. Ultimately, a wider dispersion of returns should bode very well for a strategy built on company-specific fundamentals.

We remain comfortable with our current positioning, where quality remains high and economic cyclicality relatively low. Rightly or wrongly, we think the interest rate theme is broadly neutral at this point and, from there, the incremental gains from playing the “rising rates” game are likely to be small. From an operational perspective, our portfolio companies have low underlying financial leverage, so few will face the headwind of rising interest rates. We are already discounting cash flows at or above where peak rates are likely to end up, so further rate hikes will likely have little impact on the intrinsic value of our holdings as we are.

All in all, we believe that the solid fundamentals of most of our names will play strongly in our favour in what’s likely to be a weak year of economic growth. The benefit of our small and mid cap equity strategy is that many of our companies are small players in very large markets that can grow even in a down market year over year. Our central scenario is one where inflation starts to decrease again and the U.S. Federal Reserve falls short of current interest rate peak expectations, causing the stock market to muddle through the next 12 months and produce positive returns. In our case, this is a formula for strong relative performance since investors will be forced to think about stock fundamentals in an environment where rates have peaked and sector rotation is less additive.

The only unknown in our scenario is how long the U.S. Federal Reserve holds rates steady before it starts to cut again. Given our experience on the way up, we think the FED will be slow to cut. However, if it quickly cuts rates, there is a chance that growth stocks will come back into favour faster than we expected, becoming a headwind for a predominantly core style portfolio.

With small caps as a class trading at very attractive valuations, both in absolute and relative terms, this could be a set-up for mid- to high-single digit returns this year. For long-term investors, buying into the market when money is expensive allows you to ride the inevitable wave of euphoria as money starts to get cheap again.

Our biggest sale of a longer-tenured position was in Virtu Financial, where we believe that the regulatory environment is turning more negative, and the inability of the company to be rewarded for a more consistent delivery of earnings makes us believe that the public markets are not prepared to put a high multiple on the earnings.

Our pipeline of opportunities remains strong. We have approved a few new ideas in principle, but the key stumbling block with these names remains their valuation. With these candidates, we are currently waiting for the right entry point before we start building these positions. Given the volatility in today’s markets, we are confident that one or two of them will be actionable in the first quarter of 2023, but we are not prepared to sacrifice our goal of a 15% compound annual return in our investments, if it means we buy into the name at the wrong level. We still believe that our patience will be rewarded in the long run.

Outlook

In 2022, interest rate and macro themes resulted in a very sector-driven and thematic-oriented market, where we struggled due to our broadly interest rate neutral stance and our lack of exposure to commodities and energy. A market with high sector correlation and low dispersion tends to be a tough market for bottom-up investing. We think that the impact of these issues will be much lower as we get close to peak rates and energy stock prices continue their broad reversal. Ultimately, a wider dispersion of returns should bode very well for a strategy built on company-specific fundamentals.

We remain comfortable with our current positioning, where quality remains high and economic cyclicality relatively low. Rightly or wrongly, we think the interest rate theme is broadly neutral at this point and, from there, the incremental gains from playing the “rising rates” game are likely to be small. From an operational perspective, our portfolio companies have low underlying financial leverage, so few will face the headwind of rising interest rates. We are already discounting cash flows at or above where peak rates are likely to end up, so further rate hikes will likely have little impact on the intrinsic value of our holdings as we are.

All in all, we believe that the solid fundamentals of most of our names will play strongly in our favour in what’s likely to be a weak year of economic growth. The benefit of our small and mid cap equity strategy is that many of our companies are small players in very large markets that can grow even in a down market year over year. Our central scenario is one where inflation starts to decrease again and the U.S. Federal Reserve falls short of current interest rate peak expectations, causing the stock market to muddle through the next 12 months and produce positive returns. In our case, this is a formula for strong relative performance since investors will be forced to think about stock fundamentals in an environment where rates have peaked and sector rotation is less additive.

The only unknown in our scenario is how long the U.S. Federal Reserve holds rates steady before it starts to cut again. Given our experience on the way up, we think the FED will be slow to cut. However, if it quickly cuts rates, there is a chance that growth stocks will come back into favour faster than we expected, becoming a headwind for a predominantly core style portfolio.

With small caps as a class trading at very attractive valuations, both in absolute and relative terms, this could be a set-up for mid- to high-single digit returns this year. For long-term investors, buying into the market when money is expensive allows you to ride the inevitable wave of euphoria as money starts to get cheap again.

Global Small-Cap Equity Strategy

Investment Performance

The following table shows the investment performance of the Van Berkom Global Small Cap Fund, compared to the MSCI ACWI Small Cap Index in CAD (as of December 30, 2022).

3 Mos. %Since Inception 07/30/2022 (%)
Van Berkom Global Small Cap Fund9.082.62
MSCI ACWI Small Cap (Cad)9.252.21
Value Added -0.170.42

 

Portfolio performance returns are presented gross of fees.

 

Portfolio Positioning

During the fourth quarter, the portfolio behaved as designed, reflecting the strength of our investment process in a volatile market. We outperformed throughout the earnings season early in the quarter: our portfolio of high-quality, profitable and growing companies delivered solid results with a better-than-expected outlook. However, market technicals weighed on the portfolio’s performance in the second half of the quarter. Year-end tax loss selling and a wide spectrum of drawdowns created market dislocations across multiple geographic regions and negatively affected our European and growth-oriented stocks, despite decently strong fundamentals. We ended the year with a small but consistent lead over the index since inception.

Throughout the fourth quarter, the portfolio’s largest exposure, on a factor basis, has been growth. We believe that when looking through cycles, strong organic topline growth, combined with high return on equity, are the two best drivers for outperformance. The trade-off is that growth stocks are more at risk of multiple compression. Hence, valuation discipline becomes the key to protecting our investment returns.

To put our portfolio into perspective, our average forward growth rate is 12% vs. 0% for the index. Our median ROE is 13.9% vs. 9.7% for the index. The portfolio’s median forward price-to-earnings is 16.3x vs. 14.3x for the index. For a slight valuation premium, we aim for a higher growth at a healthy return. This reflects our core investment philosophy of investing in profitable, growing companies at reasonable prices.

Significant contributors to performance in Q4 2022 include:
– Temper Sealy (+42.6%)
– SES Imagotag (+38.6%)
– Federal Signal (+24.7%)

Stocks that detracted from our portfolio’s performance in Q4 2022 include:
– Marlowe (-36.7%)
– Digital Ocean (-29.5%)
– Qualys (-19.5%)

Portfolio Changes

We made major changes to our Greater China allocations. Our proven Hong Kong-based team, which has in-depth knowledge of the local dynamic gave us conviction that the re-opening is happening faster than expected and policy support for battered sectors has been greater than projected. As a result, we added two high-quality stocks at bargain-basement valuations to the portfolio.

  • Geely is a local automobile OEM champion with international aspirations. It has a decade-long track record of double-digit growth, expanding profitability and a rising ROE. It was in a net cash position and traded at less than 10x P/E at the time of our purchase.
  • Country Garden Services is an asset-light property manager with a track record of high returns and above-average growth. It has seen its revenue grow more than 5x over the last five years, while maintaining a 20% plus EBITDA margin and a net cash position. At the time of our purchase, it was trading at less than 10x P/E and 6x EV/EBITDA.
  • To fund these new positions, we exited Singapore Exchanges, Kerry Logistics, L’Occitane and CAE.

Outlook

As bottom-up investors, we mainly focus on the long-term fundamentals of our portfolio companies. However, we are “macro aware” given its impact on near-term sentiment and, in turn, valuations. Our firm-wide approach is to validate the top-down headlines and economic indicators with insights gathered from our ~150 portfolio companies across all our strategies. This approach gives us a unique vantage point and helps us separate true signals from the noise.

As a global small cap fund, this hybrid approach offers multiple advantages. It gives us knowledge of the local market dynamics, insight into the regional social economical realities and awareness of second- and third-degree consequences of geopolitical events that affect our investments.

We see the following regions evolving differently over the next year:

China
We were an early believer in China’s reopening and see 2023 as a continuation of the structural recovery of the region lea by China. Fundamentally, we see significant sequential improvements from the re-opening through both the rebound of domestic consumer demand and the easing of corporate credit. We believe the change in policy stance towards the property and technology sectors will alleviate the overhang on valuation due to an improvement in sentiment. Although, in the short term, a surge in COVID cases will continue to supress productivity. For the year as a whole, the combination of improving fundamentals and market sentiment creates a very attractive outlook for the region.

Europe
We are more cautious about European fundamentals but believe there are incredible opportunities to be had. Consumer discretionary spending power is under enormous pressure and the mood is very negative, validated by our recent visit to the region. In terms of fundamentals, we noticed a consistent view across verticals and countries from our portfolio companies: we see solid numbers but a negative “feel.” A Swiss industrial company’s CFO put it nicely: “If we don’t read the papers that tell us about a looming recession and just look at our own business, we are quite positive about 2023.” Perhaps, with few positive catalysts, such as lower-than-expected energy prices or China reopening driven demand, Europe could see an upside surprise. Of course, the biggest overhang of the region remains the war in Ukraine. Until there’s a positive development on that front, valuations will remain subdued.

North America
We believe that corporate earnings in North America will face further pressure as growth decelerates and earnings are revised downward. However, after a 20% decline in small caps in 2022, the market consensus of a mild recession in 2023 seems reasonably priced in. Of course, as public equity investors, we naturally have a glass-half-empty perspective, so our model uses significantly more conservative assumptions. That said, we still see incredible value in our holdings and their ability to differentiate and generate consistent excess returns through different cycles.

Overall, we believe that 2023 will be the start of a new market environment due to a change in the interest rate regime: one where capital is expensive and liquidity is scarce. Investors across all asset classes are more discerning and tend to focus on tangible cashflow over aspirational growth. In the new regime, we believe that our investment focus on high-quality, profitable and growing companies should make our portfolio uniquely positioned to outperform.

Our portfolio companies have stronger growth than the index, are higher quality (higher ROE vs index), and possess healthier balance sheets (Net Debt to EBITDA of 0.3x vs. index 3.0). With such a strong profile, most of these names are operating from a position of strength. As a result, we expect them to capitalize on a downturn, which should strengthen their market positioning.

Finally, our proven investment process has weathered decades of different investment environments across geographies. We can pinpoint when our style should do well relative to the market and when it won’t. Therefore, despite near-term economic challenges, we are convinced that 2023 will be incredibly supportive for our investment style and our positioning in high-quality stocks.

We see the following regions evolving differently over the next year:

China
We were an early believer in China’s reopening and see 2023 as a continuation of the structural recovery of the region lea by China. Fundamentally, we see significant sequential improvements from the re-opening through both the rebound of domestic consumer demand and the easing of corporate credit. We believe the change in policy stance towards the property and technology sectors will alleviate the overhang on valuation due to an improvement in sentiment. Although, in the short term, a surge in COVID cases will continue to supress productivity. For the year as a whole, the combination of improving fundamentals and market sentiment creates a very attractive outlook for the region.

Europe
We are more cautious about European fundamentals but believe there are incredible opportunities to be had. Consumer discretionary spending power is under enormous pressure and the mood is very negative, validated by our recent visit to the region. In terms of fundamentals, we noticed a consistent view across verticals and countries from our portfolio companies: we see solid numbers but a negative “feel.” A Swiss industrial company’s CFO put it nicely: “If we don’t read the papers that tell us about a looming recession and just look at our own business, we are quite positive about 2023.” Perhaps, with few positive catalysts, such as lower-than-expected energy prices or China reopening driven demand, Europe could see an upside surprise. Of course, the biggest overhang of the region remains the war in Ukraine. Until there’s a positive development on that front, valuations will remain subdued.

North America
We believe that corporate earnings in North America will face further pressure as growth decelerates and earnings are revised downward. However, after a 20% decline in small caps in 2022, the market consensus of a mild recession in 2023 seems reasonably priced in. Of course, as public equity investors, we naturally have a glass-half-empty perspective, so our model uses significantly more conservative assumptions. That said, we still see incredible value in our holdings and their ability to differentiate and generate consistent excess returns through different cycles.

Overall, we believe that 2023 will be the start of a new market environment due to a change in the interest rate regime: one where capital is expensive and liquidity is scarce. Investors across all asset classes are more discerning and tend to focus on tangible cashflow over aspirational growth. In the new regime, we believe that our investment focus on high-quality, profitable and growing companies should make our portfolio uniquely positioned to outperform.

Our portfolio companies have stronger growth than the index, are higher quality (higher ROE vs index), and possess healthier balance sheets (Net Debt to EBITDA of 0.3x vs. index 3.0). With such a strong profile, most of these names are operating from a position of strength. As a result, we expect them to capitalize on a downturn, which should strengthen their market positioning.

Finally, our proven investment process has weathered decades of different investment environments across geographies. We can pinpoint when our style should do well relative to the market and when it won’t. Therefore, despite near-term economic challenges, we are convinced that 2023 will be incredibly supportive for our investment style and our positioning in high-quality stocks.